Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Search
Close this search box.

Još jedna pobeda Brada Pitta u borbi protiv Angeline Jolie

Angelini Jolie je odbijen zahtev za izuzeće sudije Jonha V. Oderkirka, koji vodi njen brakorazvodni postupak s Bradom Pittom, koji traje već četiri godine.

Reč je o sudiji koji je, između ostalog, venčao par 2014. godine, ali je i privatno dobar s advokatskim timom Pitta, zbog čega je glumica insistirala da ovaj slučaj vodi drugi sudija.

Međutim, čini se kako će ipak morati da se pomire s ovim sudijom koji je do sada vodio slučaj, piše “Vanity Fair”.

Prema rečima advokatice koja je stručnjak za razvode Christine Private, Angelinin zahtev za promenu sudije učinio joj je više štete nego koristi.

“Kad god jedna od stranaka u brakorazvodnoj parnici zatraži drugog sudiju (posebno kada je parnica već započela), to je često zato što on ili ona ne postiže povoljan rezultat kod sudije kojeg već ima i želi da pokuša da postigne povoljniji ishod s novim sudijom. Osim toga, razlog promene može biti i zato što sudija ima reputaciju u pristupu slučajevima koji nisu povoljni za njihov položaj”, pojasnila je Private.

POSLEDNJE VESTI